Search for: "Ruth v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
She then applied for benefits for the children with the Social Security Administration. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:33 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced the decision, which agreed with the Social Security Administration (SSA) [official website] that an IVF child conceived after death could only inherit benefits if guaranteed by state intestacy law:Just as the Act generally refers... [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
Capato applied for surviving child’s insurance benefits on behalf of the twins, the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her benefits. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
Capato applied for surviving child’s insurance benefits on behalf of the twins, the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her benefits. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Daniel Ortiz, representing the petitioner, Richard Culbertson, an attorney who successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court, argued in favor of a separate cap. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
Wiesenfeld (1975) she succeeded in overturning a provision of the Social Security laws that provided widows, but not widowers, special benefits for caring for minor children. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:02 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
Most of the federal ALJs sit on Social Security Administration cases (over 1,650 out of 1,926), for which it is much less likely that appointments clause objections were preserved, but given the number of cases they have, even a relative few will be bad news for the agency. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:44 am
Alito Jr., Samuel Alito, SCOTUS, Social Security, Social Security Administration, Supreme Court, Taniguchi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
On Sept. 26, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg eight days earlier. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Although a Social Security regulation has long provided that “[t]he dismissal of a request for Appeals Council review is binding and is not subject to further review,” the Social Security Administration, represented by Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston, agreed with Kimberly that the dismissal was a final decision subject to review but disagreed on one point. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
It was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the five justices who voted in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
In Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm
Along the way, it relies heavily on two of the court’s precedents: the 1946 decision in Social Security Board v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
